patching...
Breaking: VA GOP Nominates Ken Cuccinelli for Governor's Race »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Real Estate Taxes Could Increase for Manassas Residents, Businesses

The increase is part of the $220 million proposed Manassas city budget for Fiscal Year 2014.

 

The $220 million proposed city budget for next year may present a good news-bad news situation for Manassas home owners who don’t want to pay more money to the city.

The good news: the general property tax rate will remain the same—$1.192 per $100 of assessed value. Additionally, home property values are on an uptick after a free fall at the height of the recession. Residents can also look forward to no increase in utility rates and no reduction in city staff.

The bad news: The increase in property values,  along with a fire rescue tax rate levy, plus an extra three cents for the city’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)  results in a proposed increase of 7.9 percent in the average real estate tax bill.

During his Fiscal Year 2014 proposed budget presentation on Monday, Manassas city manager John Budesky said council directed him in November to not increase the general property tax rate.

However he's proposing the .008 tax levy to replace the $817,000 that will be lost next year when the SAFER Fire and Rescue Grant, expires.

Council members also asked that the city’s CIP,  be funded, but asked that it be considered separately from the annual budget, hence the 3-cent increase, Budesky said Monday.

The CIP, which is the city's plan for five years and beyond, includes money for upgrades to the city and the school division, he said.

View Budesky's entire budget presentation by clicking the PDF to the right of this story.

As far as the 2014 budget is concerned, Manassas City Public Schools is at the top of the list of priorities, the city manager said.

 The proposed budget, which is separate from the CIP, calls for $48.8 million to be transferred to Manassas schools—$1.7 million more than what the city gave last year. 

The city and the school division are in a revenue-sharing agreement that calls for 58.5 percent of revenue to go the school division.

Funding the city's schools is the largest part of the proposed budget, city staff said.

 After Budesky’s budget presentation, several residents addressed city council and spoke up either in favor or against the proposed increase in real estate taxes.

 Some residents said they are willing to pay more if it means a better city and better schools.

Others told council, now isn’t the time for an increase in real estate taxes. One resident said some Manassas families are already having to choose what bills to pay and which not to pay each month because money is so tight. 

Sequestration and the increase in healthcare costs are already a burden; higher real estate tax payments will only make it harder, a resident said.

Monday’s meeting was the first in many meetings on the city’s budget.  The final 2014 city budget won’t be approved until May 13.  Meanwhile, city council members and staff will hold public meetings almost every Monday and Wednesday until that date to discuss the budget.

Look out for more articles on the city’s proposed 2014 budget this week. The next Patch story highlights the city’s plans for investing in economic development.

Related Topics: Manassas City proposed Fiscal Year 2014 budget, Manassas city manager John Budesky, Manassas real estate taxes, fire and rescue tax levy, and real estate tax rate

Carolyn

9:33 am on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Can someone answer these questions........Why is it assumed that more money will improve school performance? Why am I being encouraged to support full funding of the CIP to save teaching positions? Isn't staffing a school budget item?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michele Frantz

1:08 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

It's not an "assumption" ... it's been proven over and over again. Better funded schools consistently out-perform poorly funded schools. For some reason the better teachers tend to want better pay, go figure. :-)

Carolyn

2:49 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Where can I find the documentation to "prove" that money equates to higher performance? Besides, pay is a school budget issue not a CIP issue. Capital Improvment Plans are created to plan for improvment or changes to infrastructure how does that translate to teacher salaries? Building a new Baldwin or Central Office has nothing to do with teacher salaries or adding teachers. BTW, how are our schools underfunded when I have heard countless times that we spend 1,000 more per student than our surrounding districts?

Reply

Stacy

9:23 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

The areas with higher funding per student are some of the worst school districts /cities in the country. That is a fact!

Reply

Brad L

9:27 am on Wednesday, March 13, 2013

The fact is higher funded teachers do NOT equate to better student performance. The problem is that the teachers unions claim that but the facts indicate that is not true. Look at data from Chicago where the teachers unions are extremely powerful and they are among the highest paid teachers in the country. Student performance is among the worst in the country.

We should not increase funding for teachers. Instead implement a merit based teacher pay for performance program and significantly reward the best teachers. Do not give raises to mediocre or poor performing teachers. Get rid of the dead wood. There is a lot of dead wood in the City of Manassas school system.

Teachers unions are only looking out to maintain their stronghold. Student performance is not their priority, instead it's all about their power.

Reply

Leave a comment